What Is WCAG 2.2 Level AA?
The Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2 became a W3C Recommendation in October 2023. It is the newest version of the standard that almost every accessibility law in the world points to, and it builds directly on WCAG 2.1: every 2.1 requirement is still there, except 4.1.1 Parsing, which was retired because modern browsers handle the problems it covered.
WCAG 2.2 adds nine success criteria. Six of them are at Level A or AA, so they matter for most organizations: Focus Not Obscured (2.4.11), Dragging Movements (2.5.7), Target Size (2.5.8), Consistent Help (3.2.6), Redundant Entry (3.3.7) and Accessible Authentication (3.3.8). Together they focus on people with low vision, motor disabilities and cognitive disabilities, and on common friction points such as sign-in forms and sticky headers.
Level AA is the target most organizations aim for. It includes every Level A requirement plus the Level AA ones, 55 success criteria in total in WCAG 2.2. Because WCAG 2.2 is backwards compatible, a site that meets 2.2 AA also meets 2.1 AA and 2.0 AA.
| Published | October 5, 2023 (W3C Recommendation) |
|---|---|
| Success criteria at Level A and AA | 55 |
| New in 2.2 at Level A and AA | 6 (plus 3 at Level AAA) |
| Removed | 4.1.1 Parsing |
| Already required by | UK public sector monitoring since October 2024 |
Who Should Test Against WCAG 2.2 AA?
- Any organization that wants the most current, future-proof target. Meeting 2.2 AA also covers 2.1 AA and 2.0 AA.
- UK public sector bodies, whose websites the Government Digital Service has monitored against WCAG 2.2 AA since October 2024.
- Teams redesigning a site or building a new one, where adopting the latest version costs little extra.
- Businesses preparing for future rules, since new laws and standard revisions tend to adopt the latest WCAG version.
The New WCAG 2.2 Criteria at Level A and AA
These are the six requirements most teams have not tested for yet. Only Target Size can be checked automatically today; the others need a short manual review.
2.4.11 Focus Not Obscured (Minimum), AA
When a control receives keyboard focus, it must not be completely hidden by sticky headers, cookie banners or chat widgets.
2.5.7 Dragging Movements, AA
Anything that works by dragging, such as sliders and sortable lists, needs a single-pointer alternative like buttons or tapping.
2.5.8 Target Size (Minimum), AA
Click and tap targets must be at least 24 by 24 CSS pixels, or have enough space around them. This checker tests it automatically.
3.2.6 Consistent Help, A
If you offer help such as a phone number, chat or contact link on several pages, keep it in the same relative place.
3.3.7 Redundant Entry, A
Do not make people type the same information twice in one process. Pre-fill it or let them select it.
3.3.8 Accessible Authentication (Minimum), AA
Sign-in must not depend on a memory or puzzle test unless there is an alternative. Allow password managers and pasting.
What This WCAG 2.2 AA Checker Tests
WCAG 2.2 Level AA has 55 success criteria. This checker runs 63 automated rules, which test 20 of them. The rest need a person to judge, and they are listed here so nothing is missed. Open a principle to see every criterion.
Perceivable 9 of 20 automated
| Success criterion | Level | How it is tested |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1.1 Non-text Content | A | Automated (7 rules) |
| 1.2.1 Audio-only and Video-only (Prerecorded) | A | Manual review |
| 1.2.2 Captions (Prerecorded) | A | Automated (1 rule) |
| 1.2.3 Audio Description or Media Alternative (Prerecorded) | A | Manual review |
| 1.2.4 Captions (Live) | AA | Manual review |
| 1.2.5 Audio Description (Prerecorded) | AA | Manual review |
| 1.3.1 Info and Relationships | A | Automated (9 rules) |
| 1.3.2 Meaningful Sequence | A | Manual review |
| 1.3.3 Sensory Characteristics | A | Manual review |
| 1.3.4 Orientationnew in 2.1 | AA | Manual review |
| 1.3.5 Identify Input Purposenew in 2.1 | AA | Automated (1 rule) |
| 1.4.1 Use of Color | A | Automated (1 rule) |
| 1.4.2 Audio Control | A | Automated (1 rule) |
| 1.4.3 Contrast (Minimum) | AA | Automated (1 rule) |
| 1.4.4 Resize Text | AA | Automated (1 rule) |
| 1.4.5 Images of Text | AA | Manual review |
| 1.4.10 Reflownew in 2.1 | AA | Manual review |
| 1.4.11 Non-text Contrastnew in 2.1 | AA | Manual review |
| 1.4.12 Text Spacingnew in 2.1 | AA | Automated (1 rule) |
| 1.4.13 Content on Hover or Focusnew in 2.1 | AA | Manual review |
Operable 7 of 20 automated
| Success criterion | Level | How it is tested |
|---|---|---|
| 2.1.1 Keyboard | A | Automated (3 rules) |
| 2.1.2 No Keyboard Trap | A | Manual review |
| 2.1.4 Character Key Shortcutsnew in 2.1 | A | Manual review |
| 2.2.1 Timing Adjustable | A | Automated (1 rule) |
| 2.2.2 Pause, Stop, Hide | A | Automated (2 rules) |
| 2.3.1 Three Flashes or Below Threshold | A | Manual review |
| 2.4.1 Bypass Blocks | A | Automated (1 rule) |
| 2.4.2 Page Titled | A | Automated (1 rule) |
| 2.4.3 Focus Order | A | Manual review |
| 2.4.4 Link Purpose (In Context) | A | Automated (2 rules) |
| 2.4.5 Multiple Ways | AA | Manual review |
| 2.4.6 Headings and Labels | AA | Manual review |
| 2.4.7 Focus Visible | AA | Manual review |
| 2.4.11 Focus Not Obscured (Minimum)new in 2.2 | AA | Manual review |
| 2.5.1 Pointer Gesturesnew in 2.1 | A | Manual review |
| 2.5.2 Pointer Cancellationnew in 2.1 | A | Manual review |
| 2.5.3 Label in Namenew in 2.1 | A | Manual review |
| 2.5.4 Motion Actuationnew in 2.1 | A | Manual review |
| 2.5.7 Dragging Movementsnew in 2.2 | AA | Manual review |
| 2.5.8 Target Size (Minimum)new in 2.2 | AA | Automated (1 rule) |
Understandable 3 of 13 automated
| Success criterion | Level | How it is tested |
|---|---|---|
| 3.1.1 Language of Page | A | Automated (3 rules) |
| 3.1.2 Language of Parts | AA | Automated (1 rule) |
| 3.2.1 On Focus | A | Manual review |
| 3.2.2 On Input | A | Manual review |
| 3.2.3 Consistent Navigation | AA | Manual review |
| 3.2.4 Consistent Identification | AA | Manual review |
| 3.2.6 Consistent Helpnew in 2.2 | A | Manual review |
| 3.3.1 Error Identification | A | Manual review |
| 3.3.2 Labels or Instructions | A | Automated (1 rule) |
| 3.3.3 Error Suggestion | AA | Manual review |
| 3.3.4 Error Prevention (Legal, Financial, Data) | AA | Manual review |
| 3.3.7 Redundant Entrynew in 2.2 | A | Manual review |
| 3.3.8 Accessible Authentication (Minimum)new in 2.2 | AA | Manual review |
Robust 1 of 2 automated
| Success criterion | Level | How it is tested |
|---|---|---|
| 4.1.2 Name, Role, Value | A | Automated (28 rules) |
| 4.1.3 Status Messagesnew in 2.1 | AA | Manual review |
What to Check by Hand
Automated rules find the code-level failures. Add these checks to cover what they cannot judge.
- Tab through the page and check that no focused control disappears behind a sticky header or banner (2.4.11).
- Try every slider, carousel and drag-and-drop feature with a single click or tap (2.5.7).
- Compare the position of your help links across several pages (3.2.6).
- Walk through checkout or sign-up and note anywhere you are asked for the same details twice (3.3.7).
- Sign in with a password manager and by pasting a password (3.3.8).
- Check that alternative text is meaningful and that focus order follows the visual order.
For a step-by-step routine, see Plan manual testing in our Help Center.
How to Use Your Results
- Fix critical and serious issues first, especially on forms, navigation and checkout. Each issue shows the failing code and how to fix it.
- Filter by criterion to hand one type of issue to the right person, for example contrast to design and labels to development.
- Rescan after each fix to confirm it, then run the manual checks above.
- Monitor the whole site. A free scan checks one page. AccessBell Pro monitors up to 500 URLs per domain against WCAG 2.2 Level AA every day and alerts you to new issues.
Related Guides
WCAG 2.2 AA Checker Questions
Is WCAG 2.2 legally required?
Not yet in most places. Most laws still reference WCAG 2.1 AA or 2.0 AA. However, the UK public sector already monitors against 2.2 AA, and new rules and standard updates are expected to adopt it. Because 2.2 includes nearly all of 2.1, testing against 2.2 AA is the safest choice.
What is the difference between WCAG 2.1 and 2.2?
WCAG 2.2 adds nine success criteria, six of them at Level A or AA, focused on focus visibility, dragging, target size, consistent help, redundant entry and accessible sign-in. It also removes 4.1.1 Parsing. Everything else is the same.
Can a WCAG 2.2 checker test every criterion?
No automated tool can. This checker runs every automated rule for WCAG 2.2 AA and shows you exactly which criteria it covers. The rest, such as whether focus is hidden by a sticky header, need a person to check. The table on this page lists both.
Does meeting WCAG 2.2 AA mean I also meet 2.1 AA?
Yes. WCAG 2.2 is backwards compatible, so content that conforms to 2.2 AA also conforms to 2.1 AA and 2.0 AA.
Sources
- W3C: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2 (opens in a new tab)
- W3C WAI: What is new in WCAG 2.2 (opens in a new tab)
- GOV.UK: Accessibility requirements for public sector websites and apps (opens in a new tab)
This page explains technical standards and is not legal advice. See our disclaimer.